In summary, the general consensus (with exceptions) was that most IoL members are supportive of a Protect Duty, and the need for venues and organisations responsible for or utilising public locations to be aware of, to adequately risk assess and finally to be able to respond appropriately to the threat of a terrorist attack. Most supported the use of capacity to determine those venues to which the Protect Duty should apply, as this would appear to be the most consistent and readily understood of the possible criteria that could be applied.
The suggested threshold of 100 as the venue capacity is generally supported although there were some
suggestions that this figure could be higher.

Read the full response.